COVID-19 Coverage : See how the pandemic is impacting the world of higher education.
Access the Business Officer Magazine menu by clicking or touching here.
Business Officer Magazine logo, click or touch this logo to return to the homepageClick or touch the Business Officer Magazine logo to return to the homepage.
Get back to the Business Officer Magazine homepage by clicking the logo.

Business Intel

June 2013


Turn Big Data Into Budget Dollars

We hear a lot about “big data” and the value  of data-based decision making. An article  in the March 2013 issue of Business Officer, “Data Point the Way,” describes a discussion by NACUBO’s Ad Hoc Group on Performance  Management about ways  predictive analytics are  driving institutional performance. At the same time, many university decision makers are drowning in information they are unable to use in such a practical way. 

The University of Chicago—with a history of educating some well-known data professionals—has recently come to embrace data analysis to address its energy costs and consumption. Arriving in 2011 as the university’s new director of engineering and utilities, I (Sumit Ray) had worked in the oil and gas industry, in which energy efficiency is paramount. It was natural to consider applying past experience to the existing work that the university was doing to tackle energy efficiency: performance contracting  with energy service companies, building retrofits, and replacing steam trap, among other activities.

A few months later an alumnus of the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, Archie Gupta, chief executive officer of Root3 Technologies, presented his company’s analytical approach to cutting the energy consumption at the university’s central utility operations. 

The idea intrigued the utilities team, as several  challenges were exerting significant impact on the  cost of running the university’s steam and chilling plants: (1) a natural gas demand charge of close to $1 million based on the peak natural gas consumption during the winter at each steam plant, and (2) the commissioning of a new utility plant to be operated in combination with the existing steam and chilling plant on the south end of campus. With a team of people physically located across the urban campus, decisions about operating the plants 24/7 needed to be well coordinated and communicated. 

Consolidating Data Points

The utilities team goal was to be able to operate the two steam and chilling plants as a unified system, in a reliable, safe, and energy-efficient manner. The ideal service could (1) centralize the large amount of data generated for each chiller and boiler; (2) display that information in real time such that all utilities team employees could see the plant’s performance numbers and make adjustments, if necessary; and (3) create a daily and weekly schedule for operating the plants. 

The university’s team spent several months talking to vendor representatives about the automated system’s flexibility when it came to deciding what boilers and chillers to run, when to run them, and at what levels—all the while maintaining the comfort of the end users in the buildings and not compromising the safety and reliability of the equipment. 

In all, the discussions and testing involved a team of five supervisors; two energy managers; the building automation system team; the cofounders of the software company; the university’s executive director of facilities operations, Joel Schriever; and 30 operating engineers, each with individual experience and thoughts on the best way to operate the plant. 

While there was support for the automated system, many individuals challenged the idea that the effort of collecting and centralizing data would be worth the cost savings that might result. 

Giving It a Try

Ultimately, the university and vendor teams agreed to pilot the data approach, with the agreement that the operating engineers would remain in charge of their respective plants and use the service to inform decisions only. (That is, the software provides a suggested action but operators have the flexibility to decide that it may not be the best approach.)

The pilot ran in June 2012 in both plants, and the university was able to reduce natural gas costs and consumption by  6 percent in the first three weeks. Initial success was good but not amazing—and the engineers quickly went back to the original way of operating the plants. However, recognizing that the service would likely only be useful if the operating engineers had some kind of incentive to use it, the University of Chicago team requested a user interface with a live chat window that allows communication about the plants, including critical information on the natural gas demand charge. 

Learning from the cascade of individual reactions to the system, the university has been able to improve communication in the entire facilities department about energy costs and consumption, so that decisions can be made quickly, based on ever-updated information. The big data that used to be fairly inaccessible to the utilities team now arrives in a form that operating engineers can access every hour of every day. 

Steve Wiesenthal, associate vice president and university architect, views the new approach this way: “The University of Chicago is committed to creating a sustainable campus and has long taken a data-driven approach to this work. As we evaluate the data that is collected with Root3 Technologies, we are finding new opportunities to understand and reduce our energy consumption.” 

SUBMITTED BY Allison Hannon, cofounder, Root3 Technologies; and Sumit Ray, director of utilities and engineering, University of Chicago.

The National Association of College and University Food Service (NACUFS) supports the Food Recovery Challenge sponsored by the Environmental Protection Agency. According to the EPA Web site, “Approximately 35 million tons of food waste was generated in 2010, with 97 percent of it being thrown into landfills or incinerators. … Additionally, 14 percent of greenhouse gases in the United States are associated with growing, manufacturing, transporting, and disposing of food.”

Fast Fact

Quick Clicks

Higher Education Fundraising Performance Shows Stable Year 

Blackbaud released in late April its 2012 Index of Higher Education Fundraising Performance, which indicates a flat year in terms of college and university advancement results. After a significant decline in 2009 due to the economic downturn, donations bounced back slightly in 2010 and 2011. The analysis, conducted annually, surveys information based on key performance indicators of annual funds at more than 100 public and private institutions. 

“Fundraising for higher education annual funds in fiscal year 2012 can best be described as stable, or flat,” said Shaun Keister, author of the report and vice chancellor of development at the University of California, Davis. “It appears that donors had a holding pattern in their charitable giving. However, this isn’t bad news—given the economic challenges over the past several years, stability is what many programs seek.”

Top-Paying Industries for the Class of 2013

The National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) released its April 2013 Salary Survey, which shows by a wide margin the industries of mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction as the areas for top-paying jobs. These employers paid new graduate hires starting salaries that average nearly $85,000. That’s over $25,000 more than the next four rankings on the list: management of companies and enterprises, construction, manufacturing, and finance and insurance. See the executive summary, available on the NACE Web site, for more details.

By The Numbers

Indy Info